Prospectus
Three sources:
1. My dad- he went to
university of Phoenix for his masters in accounting. He did not like it at all and
would support the argument of the degrading of a degree. What he learned he is
not able to use anywhere and is basically useless. Plus it was very expensive
for him to get that degree for no reason.
2. Excerpts from Government Accountability Report on
For-Profit Universities- a look into the fraud behind loans and the money
making scheme behind for profit universities
3. Holly Petreaus,
“For-Profit Colleges, Vulnerable G.I.’s”- Carey does not go into the details of
the ruthlessness of the fact that for profits target military personnel.
Source 2 expanded-
Quotes from Carey-
o
“A quarter of all federal
aid goes to for-profits, while they enroll only 10 percent of students”
o
“"90/10 rule," a federal rule that bars for-profits
from receiving more than 90 percent of their revenue from federal aid. The fact
that the rule exists at all, and that Miller is working to water it down (it
used to be the 85/15 rule), shows that for-profits operate in nothing like a
subsidy-free market.”
Quotes from Government accountability
·
“campus representatives
encouraged the undercover applicants to take out loans and assisted them in
becoming eligible either for grants or subsidized loans.”
·
“We also found that for
the five associate's degrees we were interested in, tuition at a for-profit
college was significantly more than tuition at the closest public college. On
average, for the five colleges we visited, it cost between 6 and 13 times more
to attend the for-profit college to obtain an associate's degree than a public
college.”
This source a mainly factual source that had
under cover people test and obtain information provides an example of the money
making side behind this universities. How they can make money from students
that have nothing and put them in debt for the rest of their life.
Source 3 expanded:
·
- quote from Carey “look
no further than the "90/10 rule," a federal rule that bars
for-profits from receiving more than 90 percent of their revenue from federal
aid. The fact that the rule exists at all, and that Miller is working to water
it down (it used to be the 85/15 rule), shows that for-profits operate in
nothing like a subsidy-free market..”
·
-quote from Petreaus “A
number of these schools focus on members of the armed forces with aggressive
and often misleading marketing, and then provide little academic,
administrative or counseling support once the students are enrolled.
·
Petreaus addresses how
the 10 percent does not even cover the military guaranteed GI and how this is
what for profits use as their 10 percent. So more than 890 percent of the money
at for profits can be government spending. It is a loop hole in the system.
No comments:
Post a Comment